Start with actual use
The survey records normal operation, setting, cleaning, fault recovery and maintenance instead of treating the machine as a static shape.
Existing machinery & PUWER
Survey-led retrofit guarding for older, modified or incompletely guarded machinery—developed around accessible hazards, real work tasks and the agreed improvement scope.

Illustrative metalworking scene.
BMG / SOLDirect answer
A guarding review is valuable when dangerous parts are accessible, guards are missing or frequently removed, machinery has been modified, access tasks have changed, or the current arrangement makes cleaning and maintenance impractical. PUWER applies to work equipment regardless of age or origin.
The final safeguard must follow the machine-specific risk assessment, intended use and agreed modification scope.
Project outcomes
Physical construction, access and safety interfaces are developed together so the guard does not create avoidable operating or maintenance problems.
The survey records normal operation, setting, cleaning, fault recovery and maintenance instead of treating the machine as a static shape.
Dangerous movement, ejection, trapping, reach paths and unexpected restart are considered when the physical guard and access strategy are defined.
The agreed scope can continue through detailed design, fabrication, installation, interface work and project handover.
Design brief
These questions turn a broad guarding request into a machine-specific scope that can be reviewed, manufactured and installed.
Typical applications
Frequently asked
Concise project guidance for specifiers, engineers and dutyholders. The actual machine review determines the final approach.
Ask the engineering teamYes. HSE guidance explains that PUWER is intended to ensure work equipment is safe to use regardless of its age, condition or origin. The dutyholder remains responsible for managing the risks from the equipment.
Not always. The review should consider the hazard, foreseeable access, isolation, controls, maintenance, inspection and whether the guard can be bypassed or creates another risk. The final scope depends on the machine.
Yes. Replacement guarding can be reverse-engineered around the machine, but the opportunity should also be used to confirm access, strength, fasteners, openings and safety-device interfaces are suitable for current use.
This service page describes a machine-guarding survey and upgrade pathway, not a blanket certification of the complete workplace or every PUWER duty. The exact assessment, design and verification responsibilities are agreed for each project.
Start with the machine and the task
Send photographs, dimensions or a short description. We will help define the survey, design and installation scope.